What a car taught me about control, collapse, and creative repair

On broken things, borrowed fixes, and making something whole again

You never really know how broken something is until you try to fix it.

I found that out after picking up a tired drift car with a dented rear end and a half-cut that had a bit more promise, convinced I could shape something whole out of the pieces.

The plan seemed straightforward enough: unpick the good parts from the half-cut, strip the damaged bits from the drift car, repair a bunch of rust, undo a decade of cowboy fixes by people who had more ambition than mechanical sympathy, graft everything back together properly, then source whatever else I needed.

I knew about the obvious missing pieces – the shell was completely gutted – but I had no idea about all the hidden dependencies. The brackets, clips and mysterious mounting points you only discover you need when you're trying to piece things back together.

Turns out, nothing about this was straightforward.

Disassembly: The romance of ruin

There's something deeply meditative about taking things apart.

The early phase of any rebuild tricks you into thinking you're in control. You're peeling back layers, making order from chaos. Every bolt removed feels like progress. Every component labelled, bagged, and shelved creates this illusion that the hard part's already over.

But here's the truth: disassembly isn't about control. It's about confrontation.

You find rust that's eaten through metal like it was paper. Electrical tape covering god knows what. Previous "fixes" that make you wonder what the person was thinking. Bolts that someone over-tightened because they figured tighter was better.

When you're cutting through old welds and trying to figure out why someone welded a bracket there in the first place, you start to realise you're not just taking apart a car. You're trying to understand a chain of decisions – some smart, some desperate, some that made sense at the time.

You stop asking why someone did it this way. It doesn't matter anymore. What matters is that now you have to deal with it.

This moment – standing in a garage surrounded by pieces that used to be a car – feels eerily similar to the start of any design project. You inherit a broken interface, tangled user feedback, and a trail of half-implemented decisions that seemed like good ideas at the time. A design system with components architected in ways you'd never choose. You think you're starting fresh.

You're not. You're excavating.

We talk about "user journeys" and "flows" in design, but when you pull apart a car, you're looking at actual journeys. Tangible friction. You're face-to-face with the wear patterns of actual life. The steering wheel worn smooth in specific spots. The seat bolster compressed from years of someone sliding in and out. These aren't abstract user personas – they're the physical evidence of how real people interacted with this machine.

In both cases, the real work begins once you stop idealising the system and start responding to what's right in front of you.

Repair: The edges of restoration

There's a turning point in any rebuild – quiet but definitive – when you stop disassembling and start repairing. It doesn't happen with fanfare or a checklist. It happens when you pick up a tool and realise the next move builds rather than breaks.

This is where the real design work begins. You're not preserving history, but you're not inventing freely either… you're collaborating with what already exists, negotiating between what was and what could be.

I thought I'd replace every flawed piece. That quickly proved delusional.

Most parts aren't in production anymore. For an almost thirty-year-old car, second-hand bits often cost more than I paid for both shells combined. I spend hours scouring marketplace listings, Facebook groups, international auctions just to find basic pieces. Like a complete interior – because there was literally nothing inside either car when I bought them.

I've got an engine sitting in my garage that might not even run. I could spend ages hunting for a replacement, researching which version is best, comparing specs. Or I can tear this one apart and see what's wrong with it.

That uncertainty used to stress me out. Now it just feels like where the work actually starts.

Just like legacy code in a product, or inherited constraints in a design system. You learn to ask the right question: Is it broken, or just inconvenient?

There's profound design thinking in that question. Good repair isn't about perfection – it's about judgment. Knowing what matters, what holds weight, what deserves your attention. Creativity isn't about starting from scratch; it's about learning to respond to complexity with care and intention.

Sometimes that means spending way too long getting a panel to sit right when probably no one else would notice if it was slightly off. Sometimes it means cutting a roof off one car to fix the other, knowing you can't take that back once you've done it. Sometimes it means fixing rust in places you'll never see again, because doing it right means it'll still be right in twenty years.

That's the difference between restoration and resurrection. One's cosmetic. The other's a commitment to understanding what made something worth saving in the first place.

Control: The myth of the master plan

Every rebuild starts with a plan. It has to. You need spreadsheets, timelines, budgets, reference diagrams pulled from forums where enthusiasts argue about the correct shade of Silvia Silver. Without structure, it's just expensive chaos.

But here's what they don't tell you: those plans will fail. Spectacularly.

The manual will be wrong – or more accurately, your car won't match the manual because someone's already "modified" it. The part won't fit because it's for a different model year. The bolt will shear off because it's been over-torqued by someone who thought more force equals better results. The jack will slip at the worst possible moment. You'll spend entire weekends chasing a rattle that disappears the instant someone else gets in the car with you.

Eventually, you stop treating the project like a blueprint and start treating it like a conversation.

This is where design gets interesting, too. Early in your career, you think the goal is control – pixel precision, perfect alignment, clarity from beginning to end. Every element in its place, every interaction mapped, every edge case accounted for.

But the best creative work doesn't come from control. It comes from response. From fluency. From developing the instinct to know when to stop pushing and start listening.

Building this car taught me that control is brittle – it cracks under pressure, leaves you stranded when reality doesn't match your expectations. But care? That's flexible. It bends without breaking. It adapts. It pays attention to what's happening rather than what should be happening.

That shift – from trying to control outcomes to caring about process – is where real design lives.

Rhythm: The ritual of repetition

There's something deeply humbling about spending three weekends sanding down a single wheel well. Or learning to MIG weld on scrap metal until your beads look more like proper seams than bird droppings. Or taking apart the same assembly five times because you almost got it right, but almost isn't good enough when someone's life depends on your brakes working properly.

The work's repetitive, and at first that feels like failure. Like you're not progressing fast enough, not learning efficiently.

But eventually you realise: this is the shape of mastery. Not grand epiphanies or sudden breakthroughs. Just slow, deliberate attention. One pass at a time. Each iteration teaching you something you couldn't have learned any other way.

Design follows the same rhythm. We want lightning bolts – that moment when the perfect solution appears fully formed. But most good work comes from returning to the same problems again and again, tweaking and refining, understanding just a bit more each time.

Same with interface design. You rebuild the nav three times. You rethink spacing. You revisit the typography again, even though no one asked you to. Not because it's broken – but because you care.

I've been designing for over thirteen years now, and I still find myself going back to the basics. Typography. Hierarchy. White space. The fundamentals never stop teaching you if you're paying attention.

Iteration isn't a fallback when inspiration fails. It's the practice itself.

Over time, you stop asking "Is this right?" and start asking "Is this better?" That shift changes everything. It moves you from seeking validation to seeking improvement. From fear of making mistakes to curiosity about what mistakes might teach you.

Completion: Or something like it

People ask when the car will be finished. I've stopped pretending to know.

The truth is, "done" is a fantasy. I'll get it running – that's a milestone worth celebrating. I'll paint it eventually, probably that original Silvia Silver if I can match it properly. I'll drive it, which is the whole point. But there will always be something else. A better part becomes available. A deeper understanding of how something works makes you want to do it properly this time. A small improvement that would make a meaningful difference.

That used to frustrate me. Now it feels like an invitation.

Because the goal was never perfection. It was understanding. It was process. It was learning how to work with something complex, something broken, something worth saving.

The same goes for the products we work on. You ship, and you learn. You iterate. You fix what breaks – not to make it perfect, but to make it meaningful. The best designs aren't finished; they're thoughtfully unfinished, ready to evolve with the people who use them.

Design isn't a finish line either. The best work doesn't end – it evolves. It lives in the world, gets used by real people, breaks in interesting ways, and gets repaired again. The products we love aren't perfect; they're thoughtfully imperfect. They show evidence of the care that went into making them.

What the 180SX taught me – more than any YouTube tutorial or forum thread – is that creativity begins where control ends.

It taught me that every system is messier than it looks from the outside. That every plan breaks eventually, usually in ways you didn't anticipate. That the things we build carry the stories of how we built them, and those stories matter more than we think.

Maybe the most honest work we can do – whether we're in a garage, staring at a screen, or figuring out ourselves – is to stop chasing perfection and start practising care.

The difference might seem subtle, but it changes everything. Perfection is a destination that doesn't exist. Care is a way of travelling that makes the journey worthwhile.

---

Thanks for reading! This article is also available on Medium, where I share more posts like this. If you're active there, feel free to follow me for updates.

I'd love to stay connected – join the conversation on X, Bluesky, or connect with me on LinkedIn to talk design, digital products, and everything in between.